#Dfs fantasy basketball pro#
#Dfs fantasy basketball series#

While those three players led the way, Golden State didn’t get enough production from Draymond Green or Kevon Looney in the frontcourt.īelow we’ll look at our DFS showdown lineup picks for Friday night’s main slate. Steph Curry, Klay Thompson, and Andrew Wiggins were the top scorers for the Warriors. It was a complete 360-degree change by Smart, who only scored two points in Game 2. Brown led the Celtics with 27 points (9-of-16 FG, 4-of-8 from three-point range), while Tatum added 26 points (9-of 23 FG, 3-of-9 from deep).īoston also received a boost from Marcus Smart, who had 24 points (8-of-17 FG, 3-of-7 from deep), seven rebounds, and five assists. In Game 3, Golden State was blitzed from the opening tip by the duo of Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum, who were the standout stars for DraftKings Showdown contests. If you're putting together a DraftKings Showdown lineup, we have advice and lineup picks to help you bring home some NBA DFS cash.

#Dfs fantasy basketball series#

Stacking is not necessarily a super common strategy in NBA daily fantasy because points can be scored by only one player at a time (sure, there are assists, but an assisted two-point field goal will net you just 3.The Celtics will be looking to take a commanding 3-1 series lead in Game 4 of the NBA Finals on Friday night, but regardless of what happens, we know this will be one of our final chances to play daily fantasy basketball this season. leaving salary unspent is a way to help.Īre 3-2 Lineups or 4-1 Lineups More Common? There's no one right answer, but if you want to build unique lineups. This doesn't mean that salary is irrelevant, but definitely don't prioritize spending as much of your cap as you can. In total, 51.1% of the optimal lineups used at least $59,000 of the $60,000 cap, but that also means nearly half of the perfect lineups left at least $1,500 unspent, and 11.6% of the lineups left at least $5,000 on the table.

How many of the perfect lineups used all $60,000 of the salary cap, and how many were way below that mark?

I will use 'optimal' and 'perfect' lineup interchangeably throughout. Four more lineups had ties between the two UTIL players again, I used salary to consider who was the UTIL1 and UTIL2 for the optimal purposes. This will have minimal impact throughout and will really mostly affect position averages (only marginally). In these cases, I considered the higher-salaried player as the tie-breaker. two players had exactly the same score and were, thus, tied for MVP rights).

In only 6 of the 225 lineups, there was a tie for some position inside the top three spots (e.g.

#Dfs fantasy basketball pro#

I will refer to the MVP, STAR, PRO as such and may distinguish between the two utility players as UTIL1 and UTIL2 when it's relevant. I'll rank them by salary, projection, or popularity, though. For that reason, I treat players just as players, not as positions. In NBA DFS, there's no equivalent to a quarterback, and for some teams, it's the center - not the shooting guard - who is the go-to option. There aren't too many ways to complicate this study, but unlike with my study on single-game NFL optimal lineups, I can't really refer to positions. For being such a straightforward game, there are a ton of layers to it.įoregrounding Some Terms and Things (and Such) This means that the same five players in a lineup won't score the same number of FanDuel points if the MVP and STAR are swapped. Your two UTIL players get the usual FanDuel scoring treatment. Your MVP gets his FanDuel points multiplied by 2.0, your STAR gets his FanDuel points multiplied by 1.5, and your PRO gets his FanDuel points multiplied by 1.2.

There are, though, three multiplier slots. To make a single-game lineup on FanDuel, you roster five players with at least one from each team while staying under the $60,000 salary cap. It's important to know the ins-and-outs of FanDuel's single-game format. Here are some takeaways I uncovered when looking for high-level trends, stacking, and more. That's quite a large sample of games, so surely we can learn a thing or two about approaching building optimal lineups for ourselves. That's why I went back and ran optimal lineups for 225 slates from the start of the 2019-20 season until the mid-March hiatus. I didn't quite have the right answer, so I figured I'd do something about it. Single-game slates allow us extra chances for fantasy glory and extra fun when watching the NBA.īut how should you really approach single-game NBA DFS? That's a good question. Single-game fantasy sports on FanDuel are all the rage.